Students come to university with different expectations about what reading they will need to do. Here are some of the common thoughts that people have, but are they myths or are they facts?’
1. "It is expected of me to read everything on my resource list"
2. "I should read a book that is marked as essential in full (cover to cover)"
3. "Authors of academic sources can be incorrect".
4. "Wikipedia is useful in university study"
5. "If I have not done the pre-reading before a lecture or tutorial I should not attend"
Take a few moments to consider your thoughts for each of these points, are they myths or facts? You may find it helpful to jot down some notes. Then, once you are ready, use the tabs below to see our thoughts.
Use the tabs above to see the answers for the 5 common reading thoughts.
1. "It is expected of me to read everything on my resource list."
Verdict: Myth! However you are expected to use your resource list.
Resource lists are very useful for your pre-reading and initial reading for your assignments. However these lists are often long and contain sources that overlap. Reading everything from your reading list would:
The only exception to this is if your resource list is very short with each source clearly labelled as essential. In this case, clarify with your lecturer what is expected.
How then should you use your resource list?
2. "I should read a book that is marked as essential in full (cover to cover)"
Verdict: Myth! You should only read only what is relevant.
Even sources marked as essential on your reading list will contain material that is not relevant to your course. Therefore you should be active in reading to decide what to read and what not to read. As you read more and study you will become better at judging what is or is not relevant. Initially this can be a challenge, however you should avoid reading sources cover to cover as it can:
How do I know what is or is not relevant reading?
3. "Authors of academic sources can be incorrect".
Verdict: True
Whilst academics are often right in areas of their expertise you should still be critical of what you read. There are a number of reasons why academics are not always correct.
See our guide on evaluating sources of information for further support in this area.
4. "Wikipedia is useful in university study"
Verdict: True! Whilst you should not cite Wikipedia, it can be used to give a base level understanding and as a springboard for research.
Wikipedia is a useful resource for students in the following ways:
5. "If I have not done the pre-reading before a lecture or tutorial I should not attend"
Verdict: Myth! You should always try to attend sessions where possible, even if you have not been able to do the pre-session work. This will stop you from falling behind.
Usually you will feel much better for attending, even without the pre-work than not attending at all. Even with the increasing levels of lecture recordings, it can be hard to catch up, and you may find it taking much more motivation to watch a session back than to attend live. If you do have any areas of uncertainty, watch those parts back in lecture recordings, and do any pre work that related to that area.
Complete the pre-reading where you can, as this will help you to understand the content discussed in the session and will give you the opportunity to ask questions in the lecture.
If you cannot complete the pre-reading do what you can. Even as little as 10 minutes skimming through the notes can be useful in better understanding the lecture.
Furthermore, lecture attendance is monitored and there can be consequences for failing to attend lectures and tutorials. If you have trouble attending your classes please speak with your personal academic tutor.